data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88c00/88c00b85d8a7e2783d6d19423a650c924a9fc86a" alt="Download imac display profile"
- DOWNLOAD IMAC DISPLAY PROFILE MANUALS
- DOWNLOAD IMAC DISPLAY PROFILE SOFTWARE
- DOWNLOAD IMAC DISPLAY PROFILE WINDOWS
Essentially you should never assign colour space to an image unless there is a very specific task requiring so. The setting which you are altering is image colour space and it does not affect whether what you see on your display matches what viewer sees (except when viewer's display has smaller output gamut). Practically colour space sets the colour gamut which can be used in an image.
DOWNLOAD IMAC DISPLAY PROFILE SOFTWARE
Software that supports color profiles will assume that images without an embedded profile are in the sRGB profile. Thats the most compatible and most efficient solution. Save images in the sRGB profile with gamma 2.2, but dont embed any profile in the image. For editing profile, which you set in your raw developer use editing profile like ProPhoto RGB, sRGB, etc. Convert images to the sRGB profile, but dont embed it. In case of a MBP laptop display this profile is called Color LCD. Image colour space is information describing the storage of colorimetric image information. For display profile that you set in System Preferences, either use profile that is a result of actual calibration or display profile from the manufacturer. Judging by what you say (you are seeing more saturated colours with AppleRGB) you are artificially mismanaging your image information using Photoshop/Aperture/whatever. In particular, Adobe RGB is more saturated while Color LCD is more washed out. I found that Color LCD and Apple RGB are the best, at least for me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/947e0/947e02c97710ea73c83cfca5bfbfa14034431a69" alt="download imac display profile download imac display profile"
Many modern displays conform to sRGB well but from those which don't only a small fraction is profiled. They will display images correctly in 100% of cases given that: Typically a web browser is not set up correctly for correctly viewing colorimetric images by default, neither Chrome nor Firefox are (I have not researched other browsers). Thanks to standardisation work It does not depend on the OS but it does depend on the particular software used and whether the display conforms to sRGB or is profiled if it does not.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6328/b6328184f7b78d920f752fdd394e699476d6d99f" alt="download imac display profile download imac display profile"
DOWNLOAD IMAC DISPLAY PROFILE WINDOWS
The question now is this: considering I have friends with both windows and osx, what is it likely they see?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bf28/1bf28c9bd8d5f475c18630735dab71c689ce45bf" alt="download imac display profile download imac display profile"
Other than that you can never be sure that the audience will see exactly what you do because not all software respects ICC standards and not all displays are profiled/calibrated. There are no other ways of making yourself sure you are seeing actual colour as defined by ICC.
DOWNLOAD IMAC DISPLAY PROFILE MANUALS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88c00/88c00b85d8a7e2783d6d19423a650c924a9fc86a" alt="Download imac display profile"